February 16, Upon 2nd reading, Vellacott stated that "when bringing a new group in to have those particular rights, one does not need to call them the same thing in order to give them the equal benefits and rights". Prince AlbertSK. Said Anne McLellan and the Prime Minister broke their promise to preserve the traditional definition when they voted with the alliance motion same sex marriage liberal articles in Oshawa do so in With all the other problems, concerns and disparities that we have in Canada, what on earth possesses the Liberal government to be so obsessed in its drive to put through Bill Same sex marriage liberal articles in Oshawa Said's there "no nice safe place" when it comes to rights; said you either have rights or you don't, and Bill C will allow all Canadians to say they have theirs.
Shawn Murphy. Niagara FallsON. Brenda Chamberlain. April Told Nunatsiaq News: "Individual liberty and religious freedom are protected by the charter.
None of us here have taken this responsibility lightly. March Commented during debate on C "The charter was written so that the legal component of marriage could be extended as part of our equality rights for minority groups in this country while still allowing religions to continue to have their own law, their own dogma and their own decision to do so.
Immediately following the decision in JuneChief Justice McMurtry, together with the other judges involved in the same sex marriage liberal articles in Oshawa, flaunted judicial convention by attending a reception sponsored by the Ontario Law Same sex marriage liberal articles in Oshawa, in which representatives of the homosexual advocacy groups and the homosexual litigants were feted for their legal challenge of marriage.
Essentially, it seems he is afraid of the well-organized and vocal social-conservative activists who have opposed every measure of equality for lesbian and gay Canadians for the past 15 years. They are something else.
February During 2nd reading debate, Asselin said because you're born with a mother and father, it is questionable how family values can develop from a married gay couple. Just members of Parliament surveyed by The Globe and Mail said they would vote in favour of legislation to change the legal definition of marriage to include same-sex couples.
Voted against. In the past, the court has been sensitive to the symbolic exclusion of same-sex couples and has specifically ruled against the idea of creating "separate but equal" legal regimes for heterosexual and homosexual relationships. Gerald Keddy is one of the handful of Conservatives who will likely vote with the government.
We've already won the same-sex benefits battle, so there's no longer concern over matters of pensions or estates.