There is no doubt that those who argue for wider religious exemptions in Australia will rely on the Masterpiece Cakeshop decision to further justify this expansion — indeed, this link has already been drawn by Australian Conservatives candidate Lyle Shelton.
He also noted that religious protections do not generally extend to business owners refusing to provide equal access to goods and services. The Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.
The justices' decision turned on what the court described as anti-religious bias on the Colorado Civil Rights Commission when it ruled against baker Jack Phillips. Get all the stories you need-to-know from the most powerful name in news delivered first thing every morning to your inbox Arrives Weekdays.
Region Wisconsin. In the end, the decision was modest enough to attract the votes of liberal and conservative justices on a subject that had the potential for sharp division. August 16, AM ET.
Your access to the comments has been permanently suspended. Liberal colorado same sex wedding cake in a Hobart Stephen Breyer and Elena Kagan joined the conservative justices in the outcome. The court held that the state anti-discrimination law was neutral and generally applicable and did not compel Phillips' Masterpiece Cakeshop to "support or endorse any particular religious view.
The justices voted that the commission violated Phillips' rights under the First Amendment. However, it chose to focus on the impermissible hostility shown by the Colorado Civil Rights Commission toward Phillips in Masterpiece Cakeshop. Send a letter to the editor.
Phillips was at his shop Monday morning, where he was busy answering the phone and getting congratulations from his supporters in person, including his pastor.
Greisen stated they felt the state did not represent Scardina's case well, thus taking action directly. California Paris Adult Theatre I v. Roy Goldman v. The Washington Post.